Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent plasma donors: Can we predict subjects' eligibility?

Abstract Introduction As the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic unfolds around the world; answers related to the antibody response against the virus are necessary to develop treatment and prophylactic strategies. We attempted to understand part of the immune response of convalescent plasma donation candidates. Method We carried out a cross-sectional, observational, non-intervention study, testing 102 convalescent plasma donation candidates for antibodies against the virus, relating these data to the time interval between symptom onset and sample collection, age, disease severity, and gender. Results In our sample, the individuals who developed a greater antibody response were the ones who had a longer time interval between symptom onset and sample collection, the ones who had been hospitalized and the subjects above 35 years old. Moreover, 17 individuals did not present any reactive antibodies. Conclusion These results are important in that they raise questions about the role of the humoral response against the virus, as some individuals do not develop antibodies to fight it. In addition, they help develop recruitment strategies for convalescent plasma donors, who should be asymptomatic for at least 21 days and are possibly more likely to have reactive antibodies after 35 days without symptoms.

Plasma de convalecientes como terapia para la neumonía por COVID-19 grave / Convalescent plasma as a therapy for severe COVID-19 pneumonia

Resumen La pandemia de COVID-19, presentó desde su inicio elevada mortalidad, sin tratamiento efectivo para pacientes graves. Basados en experiencia previa con plasma de convaleciente en fiebre hemorrágica Argentina, incorporamos a un estudio multicéntrico 90 pacientes con COVID-19 de los que 87 fueron evaluables. Colectamos 397 donaciones de plasma de 278 convalecientes. El plasma fue suministrado con una concentración de IgG de 0.7-0.8 (medidos por quimioluminiscencia Abbott) por cada 10 kg/ peso. La supervivencia a 28 días fue la variable de resultado primario. El 77% fueron varones, edad 54 ± 15.6 años (rango: 27-85); índice de masa corporal de 29.7 ± 4.4; tenían hipertensión 39%, diabetes 20.7%; 19.5% tenían alguna condición de inmunosupresión, y el 23% era personal de salud. Se administró plasma a 55 (63%) en respiración espontánea con oxígeno (con máscara reservorio en 80%), y a 32 (37%) en ventilación mecánica. La supervivencia global a 28 días fue del 80%; 91% en quienes recibían oxígeno suplementario y 63% en los que permanecían en ventilación mecánica (p = 0.0002). Hubo mejora significativa en la escala clínica de neumonía de la OMS a los 7 y a los 14 días. La ferritina, LDH y PaO /FiO, mejoraron en la semana post-infusión. Observamos un episodio de sobrecarga de volumen circulatorio y una reacción febril, leves. Las infusiones de plasma de convaleciente son factibles, seguras y potencialmente efectivas, especialmente antes de requerir ventilación mecánica. Constituyen una opción clínica atractiva para tratar formas graves de COVID-19 hasta que estén disponibles otras terapias eficaces.

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic presented high mortality from its beginning, without effective treatment for seriously ill patients. Build on the experience in Argentine hemorrhagic fever with convalescent plasma, we incorporated 90 patients with COVID-19, of which 87 were evaluable, into a multicenter study. We collected 397 plasma donations from 278 convalescent donors. Patients received plasma with an IgG concentration of 0.7-0.8 (measured by Abbott chemiluminescence) for every 10 kg of body weight. Survival during the first 28 days was the primary objective; 77% were male, age 54 ± 15.6 y/o (range 27-85), body mass index 29.7 ± 4.4; hypertension 39% and diabetes 20.7%; 19.5% had an immunosuppressive condition, 23% were health workers. Plasma was administered to 55 (63%) on spontaneous breathing with oxygen supplementation (mainly oxygen mask with reservoir bag in 80%), and to 32 patients (37%) on mechanical ventilation. The 28-day survival rate was 80%; 91% in patients infused on spontaneous breathing and 63% in those on mechanical ventilation (p = 0.0002). There was a significant improvement in the WHO pneumonia clinical scale at 7 and 14 days, and in PaO / FiO , ferritin and LDH, in the week post-infusion. We observed an episode of circulatory volume overload and a febrile reaction, both mild. Convalescent plasma infusions are feasible, safe, and potentially effective, especially before requiring mechanical ventilation. They are an attractive clinical option for treating severe forms of COVID-19 until other effective therapies become available.